East Meets West Revisited

About a year ago, we looked at the results of the various U.S. rugby union championship competitions and declared a slight edge for the Western United States over the Eastern United States. If this weekend's Men's Club Championships are any indicator, that Western dominance continues.

This year, the Division I, II, and III playoff formats were all arranged such that in each division, 16 clubs played in Eastern and Western regional brackets with two teams from each region advancing to the semifinals. This meant that each semifinal match at level of play featured an Eastern Side versus a Western side. In those semifinal matches, played today, not a single side from the East survived. Six semifinal matches, all won by the Western representatives.

That mean that not only will all of these competitions be won by a Western side, but an Eastern side won't even appear in the final at any of these levels.

Although other American competitions used different playoff formats, they also point toward Western dominance. The Collegiate Men's Division I championship match last month featured a pair of Western sides, as did the Boy's High School and Under-19 age-grade competitions from two weeks ago.

Tonight's Rugby Super League final and last month's Girl's Under-19 final were also won by Western sides, though the runners-up were from the Eastern side of the country in both cases. The 2009 Women's Club final has yet to be played, but a Western side bested an Eastern side in the 2008 tournament. The only exceptions to this pattern of Western dominance are the Women's Collegiate Division I and II tournaments and the Men's Collegiate Division II tournament, which were all won by Eastern sides in May.

Of twelve national champs, then, that means nine are from the West. Again, perhaps just as telling is that more than half of those championships didn't even feature an Eastern side in the final. More Western dominance next year? We'll see ...